Install slack arch11/7/2023 ![]() Multimedia:Īrch has new and fresh packages while Slackware has older packages and his ALSA and Mplayer are quite older. Slackware is for people who need systems with stable and secure packages and Arch is for people who need systems with newer packages, but still fast and stable. Arch is a rolling release and many people say that such a system isn’t stable but Arch is stable. That is how we lost Gnome in first place. ![]() What Patrick does not like, does not come to Slackware. But there is Patrick with his criterion for packages. Current release is something like Slackware testing. With packages with bigger bugs fixed that are moved in current release. The packages go to main tree when all bugs are fixed. Slackware is alongside Debian well known for its stability. Also you can choose from many GUI based package managers. For communicating with AUR there is the program yaourt. Arch also offers AUR ( Arch user repository ) with almost has every package you will ever need. Arch, on other hand, has an very nice and high quality package manager named pacman. Slackware does not resolve dependencies by default and the user need to take care of them. But there are many third party package managers and some of them are also resolving dependencies. Main philosophy is that the user is responsible for the system that he uses. An package manager from first generation called package installer/uninstaller. Slackware is a source based distribution, while Arch is an binary distribution. Pure BSD manner of Slackware is hard and requests high user concentration. On other side, Slackware is configured in the old fashion way. Today, after moving to systemd things are much easier and almost all configuration are done with five lines of text in terminal. Winner: Slackware Configuration and usage:īack in the days, Arch was configured in a file called rc.conf located in the /etc directory. ![]() Both processes are fast, but installation on Slackware is a bit easier for newcomers and some options can be easily configured after the installation. Slackware offers a nice ncurses based installer and Arch has a fast and simple text driven installer. Installationīoth, Arch and Slackware have textual based installation. But let’s take a look at some of the main aspects of a GNU/linux Distribution. Today quality and simplicity don’t go together. Great customization, great user experience and unique philosophy. Both, Arch and Slackware, bring only the best to the operating system experience. Many myths about Arch/Slackware and I should say also Gentoo aren’t true. And also many myths are around surrounding these two distributions, for someone they are hard to install, hard to use, hard for administration, good only for geeks. Many things are spoken around Arch and Slackware. The 'fix' is to wait for Slack to make their comparison case insensitive.On many sites there are a lot of information about Ubuntu or its successor, Mint, these distributions are excellent, very good for those who have never seen anything on Linux, but maybe someone could be more interested in having a greater freedom of action and try something that goes beyond a well-marked path, so what do you think of the GNU/Linux Arch and Slackware distributions ? The ticket is marked 'resolved downstream' as lowercasing the URL is correct RFC behavior and "likely" an intentional choice by QUrl developers. I'm guessing the issue is similar for other WMs if they happen to be using Qt and QUrl for this purpose. The problem is that QUrl internally sanitizes the hostname part of the url (anything between the slack:// and the next /) and thereby converts it to lowercase That uses QUrl everywhere to parse and store urls. For anyone who gets here searching for Slack not signing in on KDE with Chrome or Chromium based browsers, this is the crux:Ĭhrome calls xdg-open, which calls kde-open5, which uses KIO::OpenUrlJob internally.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |